Service
A job post that works becomes its own problem. Two hundred applications arrive, most are nowhere close, and the good candidates take another offer while somebody works through the pile at night. Reading faster is not the fix. A process that sorts before a human opens anything is.
Resumes are a bad screening format and everybody keeps using them anyway. We build an application flow that asks the three or four things you really decide on (tools they have used, a situation they have handled, availability, comp expectations) and stores the answers as structured fields instead of prose. The candidate gets a form that takes six minutes. You get a table you can sort.
Every applicant gets scored against a rubric you write, and the score comes back with the specific lines from the application that produced it. That last part matters. A number with no explanation is something nobody trusts by the second week, and a rubric you can argue with is a rubric you can fix. The system ranks and flags. A person decides who gets an interview, every time.
The strongest signal in hiring is watching somebody do a small version of the job. It also creates a scheduling mess: sending the task, tracking who finished, chasing the ones who went quiet, collecting the output somewhere reviewable. We automate that loop, so running paid trials with eight candidates costs about the same effort as running one, and the finished work lands in one place with a timestamp.
Good applicants accept somewhere else during the week your team spends deliberating. We set up status updates that go out on their own, scheduling links tied to your real calendar, and a short honest note to everyone you pass on. It keeps the process from leaking people who were still interested, and it protects your name for the next time you post.
Common Questions
A 30-minute call, no charge. If we can help, we will show you how. If we cannot, you still leave knowing what to do next.